Recent Trends in PE investments in Real Estate sector in India

The PE investments in real estate was recorded at $276 million (around Rs 1,638 crore) in first half of 2013 as compared to $514 million (around Rs 3,050 crore) in the same period last year. The decline in the quantum of PERE investment was essentially due to less number deals (13 in H1 2013) as the average ticket size of deals remained same.

Consultancy firm Cushman and Wakefield attributed the drop to the volatility in the market, including slower growth of the Indian economy, political stalemates and depreciation of the rupee. While, there is a strong investment sentiment for PERE transactions in India, they display a reflection of the market sentiments, where funds are looking at only embarking on projects with strong fundamentals.

Even though private equity investment in the Indian real realty has fallen nearly 50 per cent to $276 million in the first half of 2013 due to lack of good projects and weak sentiment, foreign investors are still bullish on the sector. PE funds continue to show keen interest in the market with a number of deals in discussion.

“Investors are willing to invest in real estate; however they are exploring the market for right real estate projects. We anticipate that in the next few quarters, after some regulatory and politico-economic environment are regularised, the momentum in real estate will pick up throwing open more investible options for the investors,” said Sanjay Dutt, Executive Managing Director of South Asia operations, C&W. He added, currently, it was estimated that around $2 billion is ready to be deployed in the real estate sector of the Indian market. The fund raising environment (domestic and offshore) has consistently improved with more quality capital available for the sponsors with demonstrated track record.

According to property consulting firm Cushman and Wakefield about $2 billion (Rs 11,854 crore) is available with private equity firms ready to be deployed in real estate in the next one year, but PE funds want to put in money only in those projects with strong fundamentals. According to Sanjay Dutt, despite the slowdown in the construction market and the reduced number of investible projects in India, real estate is still the fourth most-invested sector by private equity funds.

“We anticipate that in the next few quarters, after some regulatory and politico-economic environment are regularised, the momentum in real estate will pick up throwing open more investible options for the investors,” he said.

So far in 2013, the highest value PE investment was $131.6 million in Pune, followed by $67.5 million in Mumbai, $38.8 million in the National Capital Region, and $16.9 million in Bangalore.

Even data from Venture Intelligence shows that private equity-Real Estate firms made 13 investments (amounting to $318 million across 12 deals with disclosed values) during the quarter ended June 2013. The volume of investments perked up significantly from the seven investments in the same period in the previous year (which witnessed $172 million being invested across six transactions with disclosed values) and also the eight investments (worth $569 million) during the Jan-Mar 2013 quarter.

However, there is a strong growing trend towards investments in ready office space. The growing stability of the market is reflected by the continuous growth of the core investors (number and value) with over $1.3 billion (Rs 7,705 crore) invested in ready office space during the last three years.

Some recent marquee deals/developments in PE investments:

•          Pune witnessed transactions such as the Panchshil Realty and Ireo Management Ltd SEZ by Blackstone for $75.9 million (Rs 4.5 billion).

•          Ascendas Trust’s Rs 600 crore (about $110 million) acquisition of 2 million sq. ft of office space in Hyderabad from Phoenix Group was the largest investment during the second quarter of FY13. This was followed by Xander’s Rs 280 crore ($52 million) investment in Supertech’s 125 acre township project in Gurgaon and Clearwater Capital’s (along with Ajay Piramal Group non-banking financial company PHL Finance) Rs 300 crore ($50.2 million) investment to finance VGN Developers’ acquisition of a land parcel for a gated community project in Chennai.

•          In September ‘13, Kotak Real Estate fund said it had raised $200 million (Rs 1,200 crore) from select group of investors and has firmed commitments to raise $200 million more to close its $400 million eight-year tenure fund to invest in only residential properties in India’s six metros.  The fund will invest an average of $15-20 million in each project and will put in money from the first close in 10-12 projects. It is looking to generate a return of 20 percent for investors of the new fund.

•          PE Firm, Indian Property Advisors Pvt Ltd. (IPAL) is planning two funds – a Rs 300 Cr domestic fund and $250 – 300 million offshore fund, which would be raised in the second quarter of 2014. IPAL would be investing in small redevelopment projects with a turnaround of three years and will only fund for the growth capital.

The company plans to have plain vanilla equity investment rather than a structured deal.

•          Even Tata Realty has put its 780,000 sq ft IT park in Mumbai’s Goregaon suburb on the block and aims to raise Rs 800 crore through the sale of the park, while Oman’s State General Reserve Fund and the Government of Singapore Investment Corp (GIC), investment firm Temasek committed to invest $200 million in HDFC Real Estate Fund.

•          DLF, India’s largest real estate company, had initiated talks with four buyers, including leading private equity (PE) funds, for the sale of Aman Resorts, its luxury hotels chain, said a source involved in the deal. In December 2012, DLF had announced it had sold the entire stake in Aman Resorts for $300 million to Adrian Zecha, the hotel chain’s founder. Sources said Zecha had missed two payment deadlines in March and June, adding he wasn’t able to raise funds for the deal. “Adrian is still in the fray. Being a management buy-out, it is taking time to close. In the meantime, they (DLF) are also in discussions with four other buyers, including some global PE funds that are in various stages of evaluation and diligence,” the sources said. “They are not banking on one buyer for the sale. That is why they’re talking to three-four companies.”

•          The real estate fund of Morgan Stanley has abandoned plans to invest nearly $200 million (about Rs 1,240 crore) in an upcoming commercial real estate project in Mumbai after the rupees recent plunge against the dollar made the deal unrewarding, three people familiar with the development said. Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund was working on the structured finance deal with Mumbai based Wadhwa Group since January to invest in the latter’s 1.6 million square feet office project in Bandra-Kurla Complex. Construction on the project, called ONE BKC, is due to be completed in the next 12-15 months. The fund has invested about $780 million in Indian real estate so far and the investment in ONE BKC would have been its first in a commercial property in Mumbai. Returns that were arrived at in earlier negotiations between Morgan Stanley and Wadhwa were shrinking even before concluding the deal, one of the people quoted earlier said. The hedging cost for the entire deal would have been huge. Morgan Stanley declined to comment, but Wadhwa Groups chief financial officer Srinivasan Gopalan confirmed that the proposed deal has fallen through. Wadhwa Group is now in process of raising domestic debt of over Rs 1,100 crore from Standard Chartered Bank for the project.

(Sources: First Post 1st August 2;013, Economic Times-26-Sep-2013, Live Mint 19th Sep ’13, Business Standard 28th Sep ’13, 27th July ’13)

Views of Mr P. H. Ravikumar, Managing Director, Capri Global Capital Ltd on the Mid-Quarter Monetary Policy: September 2013 announced by RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan

Markets have reacted adversely to the surprise hike in the repo rate by the Governor of Reserve Bank of India in the Monetary Policy announcement today.

The Market expectations of status quo at the worst or a cut in repo rate in my view were clearly part of the euphoria generated from out of the positive developments on several fronts during the last few weeks post the assumption of charge by Mr. Raghuram Rajan as Governor of RBI.

However, the inflation statistics and the food inflation in particular should be of serious concern to all policy makers. I believe the new Governor is sending a strong signal to markets of his unhesitating ability to take unpopular decisions if such decisions are warranted by ground realities. The Governor has sent a strong message so early in his tenure to the market “don’t take me for granted”.

The deferment in withdrawal of quantitative easing by US has given Indian policy makers a breathing space of three months at the least and six months at the best. It is important that key policy decisions to insulate the economy (to the extent possible on final QE withdrawal by US must be taken quickly even if some of these decisions are not popular).

While the tight interest rate out look continues to be on cards in the short run definitely, Reserve Bank of India will need to address the issues of sufficient liquidity in markets given that the busy season is now round the corner. The management of the currency exchange rate is the other major issue which will have to be addressed. Allowing the Rupee to strengthen beyond current levels may not be actually in the interest of the overall economy in general and exporters in particular.

Source: http://rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=29590

MSME schemes - Do you know all of them

How many Government schemes are currently in place to support our micro, small and medium enterprise sector? You may find this a little difficult to answer! Some of the schemes are widely known, but about many others information is not easily available. Here, I have prepared a list of various programmes, schemes and incentives offered by the MSME ministry, and request you to check whether you are aware of them or not.

As far as credit facilitation -- the biggest problem of our MSMEs -- is concerned, there are a number of schemes, including Credit Guarantee Fund Scheme for MSEs (CGMSE) that covers collateral free credit facility, Micro Finance Programme operated by SIDBI, Trade Related Entrepreneurship Assistance and Development (TREAD) Scheme for women, and Performance and Credit Rating Scheme under which MSMEs can get themselves rated by any of seven accredited agencies.

Similarly for skill development, there are a number of programmes, including Industrial Motivation Campaigns, Entrepreneurship Development Programmes (EDPs), Entrepreneurship Skill Development Programmes (ESDPs), Management Development Programmes (MDPs), Rajiv Gandhi Udyami Mitra Yojana (RGUMY), etc. In addition, a number of Tool Rooms & Technical Institutions and Technology Development Centres (Research Institutes) located across the country provide training and assistance to MSMEs.

To support small enterprises in marketing, the MSME ministry offers as many as five schemes, including International Co-operation Scheme, Market Development Assistance Scheme for MSEs (SSI-MDA) - Participation in Exhibition, Vendor Development Programme for Ancillarisation, WTO Export Programme (EP), and Public Procurement Policy for goods produced and services rendered by MSEs by the Central Ministries, Departments and PSUs.

On technology upgradation, there are two notable MSME schemes: Credit Linked Capital Subsidy Scheme and ISO 9001/ISO 1400/HACCP Certification Reimbursement Scheme. Under the first scheme, 15 percent upfront capital subsidy is provided on term loan for induction of improved technologies while the second one is designed to incentivize quality upgradation, improvement, environment management and food safety systems.

For enhancing manufacturing competitiveness, the Ministry offers a number of schemes including Lean Manufacturing Competitiveness Scheme and Design Clinic Scheme, Promotion of ICT Tools in MSME sector, Technology and Quality Up-gradation Support, Marketing Assistance and Technology Up-gradation Support, National Campaign for Building Awareness on IPR, Support for Entrepreneurial and Managerial Development of SMEs through Incubators, Encouraging Adoption of Bar Codes, etc.

So, there is no dearth of schemes -- close to 58 only from the Ministry of MSME, and and if we add to them those offered by NSIC, KVIC, and Coir Board, the list will get much longer-- but despite this, the sector has not achieved much from them. Beyond doubt, this is primarily due to the operational inefficiencies in our current system for small business support, and only a genuine root-and-branch reform in this direction could change the situation, but at the same time we think our lack of awareness is also responsible, at least to some extent.

Source: Money Matters India, www.money-matters.in

Securitisation and India

Securitisation is the financial practice of pooling various types of contractual debt such as residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, auto loans or credit card debt obligations and selling said consolidated debt as bonds, pass-through securities, or collateralized mortgage obligation (CMOs), to various investors. The principal and interest on the debt, underlying the security, is paid back to the various investors regularly. Securities backed by mortgage receivables are called mortgage-backed securities (MBS), while those backed by other types of receivables are asset-backed securities (ABS).

In India, securitisation has been for while now, the route to achieving the mandatory priority sector targets for banks both domestic and multinational. Securitisation as a market itself has evolved from being mere sale of portfolio from one organization to another to becoming complex structures in itself. This market has been in existence since the early 1990s, though has matured significantly only post-2000 with an established narrow band of investor community and regular issuers. In the early 1990s, securitisation was essentially a device of bilateral acquisitions of portfolios of finance companies. There were quasi-securitisations for sometime, where creation of any form of security was rare and the portfolios simply got transferred from the balance sheet of the originator to that of another entity. In recent years, loan sales have become common through the direct assignment route, which is structured using the true sale concept. Europe and United States has one of the most complex and developed securitisation market. India is still a small market where securitisation grew 15% over previous year in value terms. The number of transactions was also 32% higher in FY2012 than in the previous fiscal. The number and volume of retail loan securitisation (both ABS – Asset Backed Securitisation and RMBS – Residential Mortgage Backed Securitisation together), was the highest in FY2012 compared to previous fiscals, while the LSO (Securitisation of individual corporate loans or loan sell-off) issuance was the lowest ever. This in reality is an increase in volume—following a continuous decline for three years and was on account of a 26% rise in securitisation of retail loans.

In India, issuers have typically been private sector banks, foreign banks and non-banking financial companies (NBFCs) with their underlying assets being mostly retail and corporate loans.

The key objectives for Indian banks include:

·       Liquidity: Securitisation is an easy route than raising deposits that are subject to reserve requirements

·       Regulatory issues: Constrains arising out of Provisions, priority sector norms, etc.

·       Capital Relief: Major investors are mostly mutual funds (money market/liquid schemes), close-ended debt schemes and banks. Long term investors like insurance companies and provident funds are currently not active due to regulatory constraints. Foreign institutional investors are also missing due to regulatory ambiguity. As per guidelines, mutual funds are required to declare their NAV’s on a daily basis due to which they prefer the structure/asset classes which involve low pre-payment rates. The lack of domestic non-traditional hedge fund style investors to participate in equity and mezzanine tranches has led to originators holding them.

Some examples of securitisation in the Indian context are:

·       First securitisation deal in India between Citibank and GIC Mutual Fund in 1991 for Rs 160 mn

·       India’s first securitisation of personal loan by Citibank in 1999 for Rs 2,841 mn.

·       India’s largest securitisation deal by ICICI bank of Rs 19,299 mn in 2007. The underlying asset pool was auto loan receivables.

·       India’s first mortgage backed securities issue (MBS) of Rs 597 mn by NHB and HDFC in 2001.

·       Securitisation of aircraft receivables by Jet Airways for Rs 16,000 mn in 2001 through offshore SPV.

·       India’s first floating rate securitisation issuance by Citigroup of Rs 2,810 mn in 2003. The fixed rate auto loan receivables of Citibank and Citicorp Finance India included in the securitisation

·       India’s first securitisation of sovereign lease receivables by Indian Railway Finance Corporation (IRFC) of Rs 1,960 mn in 2005. The receivables consist of lease amounts payable by the ministry of railways to IRFC

·       L&T raised Rs 4,090 mn through the securitisation of future lease rentals to raise capital for its power plant in 1999.

An important change negating lot of banks from lending to NBFCs was what we observed in the ‘Master Circular by the RBI for Lending to Priority Sector’ released in July 2011, where loans by banks to NBFCs no longer qualify as Priority Sector Lending (PSL). With this change in regulation there was only one major way in which banks could meet their shortfall in priority sector lending targets, viz., acquisition of compliant portfolios from NBFCs. For the Originators’ (or NBFCs) motive in entering into these transactions was a pricing, capital relief and tenure-matched funding, apart from having an alternate fund-raising channel. This saw a neat rise in transactions involving bilateral assignment of retail loan pools of mainly including loans to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) or Small Road Transport Operators (SRTOs) and micro credit.

These Bilateral assignments which account for around 75% of ABS and RMBS volume in India—continued to be the preferred route relative to conventional securitisation, given that these transactions were not covered by RBI’s guidelines of Feb 2006 on securitisation, thus making them less restrictive for originators.

That no longer is the case according to our internal estimates given that the RBI Guidelines on Securitisation issued in May 2012 that prohibit stipulation of credit enhancement for assignment transactions, thus exposing the purchasing banks to the entire credit risk on the assigned portfolio.

Priority Sector Lending targets however continue to exist and continue to get stricter and larger (MNCs with greater than 20 branches now are treated similar to domestic banks with 40% of their lending portfolio to be to the Priority Sector. And these could going forward be met at-least partly through the securitisation route, wherein credit enhancement is permitted.

Securitisation too is has its own deterrents which are high capital charge for Originators and impact of mark-to-market for the Investing Banks. Another key constraint presently is the ambiguity on the taxation of PTCs (or Pass Through Certificates), a matter which is presently sub-judice. Pending clarity on the issue, Mutual Funds—as well as several banks—are staying away from making fresh investments in PTC instruments. The microfinance industry saw 13% rise in deals involving sale of portfolio through securitisation and other bilateral transactions last financial year.

Last year, sailing through rough waters, the MFI industry managed to strike deals worth Rs 3700 crore (securitisation and direct assignments). This year, the industry is expected to have sold portfolios worth Rs 4,200 crore to banks and other financial institutions, according to data from MFIN (microfinance institutions network).

Additionally, RBI’s expected adoption of the proposals of the Nair committee on Priority Sector Lending (report submitted in February 2012) would be a key regulatory guideline which could further affect the securitization market in India.

We await further guidelines this year from the regulator – this will in addition to the changes in Priority Sector Norms affect the market in totality.